October - November 2001
Human Sacrifice
God said Abraham kill me a son
Abe said man, you must be puttin' me on
-Dylan
If you think I am opinionated, you have not heard me rant,
reason, argue, bellow howl and scream about the death penalty.
If you're "pro," and ever meet me, don't bring it up
unless you're prepared to miss your flight, miss meals, and forego
whole nights of sleep while I drag out documents and story after
story of the horrors of what is officially called, on the certificate
of death, State Homicide.
If you call yourself Christian and you support the death penalty,
your position is stratospherically hypocritical: read your New
Testament and call me in 50 lifetimes, or please stop pretending
to worship the compassionate teacher who forgave his own executioners.
We live in a country -- the last in the so-called free world
to commit State Homicide -- that executes people who committed
crimes before the age of 18, that executes mentally ill patients,
that convicts and executes the innocent, and whose citizens cheer
outside the gates of executions. That there are anti-death penalty
protests I can understand. Do we really need pro-death penalty
protests? After all, a bunch of pro-death penalty activists are
inside preparing a man to be killed, by them.
A room full of people watched Timothy McVeigh die on television
by way of a hidden camera trained on his face as he was given
the lethal injection. Some claimed that witnessing his death
was not satisfying enough. These people need sex, not death.
But sex, of course, is immoral. There is a connection.
There are several debates between the pro and con camps. One
is whether it's cheaper to fry'em. It's not; read the budget.
Another is whether death deters death; there is no evidence of
this, and considerable evidence that the death penalty brutalizes
society, and that murder increases around the time of high-profile
executions. In the Dakotas, one of which has long been pro and
the other of which has always long con, the murder rate is the
same. This is hardly compelling evidence of deterrence.
We do know several things for sure, however. We know that
the process takes an enormous toll on the people who have to
carry it out, including the executioners and wardens. We know
that the process is not fair, with people of color being far
likelier to face state-sanctioned death than white ones, and
men far more likely than women, and the poor far likelier than
the rich, and so on. All perfectly established.
We could use our minds and surmise that for all of society
to take responsibility for killing one person, or to stand idly
by, turns hundreds of millions of people into murderers. That's
a lot of killers.
A Libertarian law student I was friends with in Buffalo came
up with what so far is the best legal argument against the death
penalty I've ever heard, which is that no jurist can say for
sure what death is, therefore no court has business imposing
it as a punishment. We could, for example, be sentencing a mass
killer to eternal bliss, or a normal killer to suffer a thousand
deaths in hell.
Those who are more inclined toward philosophy will understand
that there is a vast difference between revenge and justice,
and we can clearly see that revenge is a tremendous motive behind
capital punishment. But I feel that even this is to look on with
rose-colored glasses. It is clear that the people who sell us
on the death penalty are deeply enamored of its power, and of
their privilege to selectively commit legal murder against classes
of people they are known to despise. You and I may not think
this way, but power hungry people love death because death works.
It establishes their supremacy, in their own minds and in public
consciousness. And hey, the former governor of Pennsylvania received
a heart, lungs and liver from a death sentence inmate while he
was in office.
But I think this is all still way too rosy to establish why
public officials cling to this practice. And while I am not one
to deny perpetrators consciousness of their own motives, I think
this one may lurk in their subconscious. The reason is that the
death penalty is human sacrifice, which is about the most powerful
magic anyone can perform. Many of our presidents, senators and
other national leaders have been involved in Masonic-type organizations
(such as the Skull and Bones Society) and are aware that there
are other dimensions of power besides overtly stated law and
official channels of authority. There is the whole hidden dimension
of power, and while most of these men are hardly adepts, some
are, and many others are aspiring sorcerer's apprentices.
The death penalty is a human sacrifice ritual, however you
look at it, in a society that worships death. It is a ritual,
it involves a human, and since it doesn't actually accomplish
anything productive in the real world, it is a sacrifice. Human
sacrifice has been used throughout history by priests, leaders
and men of power to appease the gods and invoke the forces of
nature. In our apocalyptic society, with its Old Testament superstitions,
morals and ethics, it should not be surprising that human sacrifice
has surfaced in its politically and legally sanitized form.
God save us.